And now the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has clearly emptied letter No. V. 25011/276/2009-HR of May 5, 2010, “that, in accordance with the orders of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court cited here, there is no proposal to prevent petitioners from practicing electrohopathy or providing education as long as it is done under the provision of Ordinance No. 14015/25/96-U & H (Pt) of 25 November 2003. Once legislation on the recognition of a new system of medicine had been promulgated, any practice or training would be regulated in accordance with that law. “Before homeopathy was recognized as a system by the ministry in the 70s, there were a good number of homeopathic institutions and a large number of homeopathic practitioners practicing without state recognition. The situation is similar with electrohomeopathy. On 24.11.2000, the Supreme Court Chamber, composed of Justice Rajendra Babu and B.N. Agarwal, rejected the SLP, which was rejected by a petitioner (Delhi Government and Union of India). In 18-11-1998, the Supreme Court ordered that the legality of electro-homeopathy maintain the same status as that granted by the Delhi High Court, FAO No. 205/92. Nearly 200 delegates, including advocates, practitioners and specialists in electrohomeopathy, gathered from different states to share best practices. Dr Hussain said the conference aims to raise awareness about electro-homeopathy.
8. Notification to the Directorate of Health Services, Delhi NCT Government on 20.06.2003. The Directorate of Health Services, Delhi NCT Government also issued a communication Empty No. F.7(512)/2003/DHS/HQ/CC/AQC/8115 dt. 20.06.2003 confirming that holders of diplomas/certificates from the NEHM of India are allowed to practice the electropathy system of medicines in the light of the Order of the Delhi High Court of FAO No. 205/92. The Hon. Delhi Court (Bench Division), composed of Justice Y.K. Sabharwal, then Acting Chief Justice and Justice S.K. Gupta, had formulated the rules regarding the legality of diplomas/certificates, thus allowing doctors to practice an electropathic medical system based on it.
The Supreme Court of Calcutta recognized electro-homeopathy on 7 May 1999. The Jabalpur High Court recognized the practice of electro-homeopathy on 19 March 1999. The Supreme Court of Madras had on 9. June 1998 rendered the verdict on the use of the word doctor before the name: “Those who practice an electrohomeopathic system of medicine have the right to `use` the word `DOCTOR` before the name by representing the symbol `EH` (electrohomeopathic). The government wants to control these costs and make health care affordable in the state and has invited an electro-homeopathy delegation to start discussions with the ministry to discuss the prospects for electro-homeopathy. The right of homeopathic practitioners is well protected by Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution. Since electropathy works for the purpose of “promotion, development and research” and at that time no law was passed by Parliament. As such, it does not fall under the central government/state medical law overview. All recognized medical systems have been recognized by a specific law of parliament. For example: Recognition of Medical Science under the Allopathy (Western Medical System) Indian Medical Degrees Act (under the M.C.I. Act, 1916 or the Medical Council of India Act, 1956) Ayurveda and Unani Indian System of Medicines (ISM) Act, 1970 Homeopathy Central Council of Homoeopathy Act, 1973 The four medical systems also had to fight long before they could be recognized. In the meantime, these systems were developed professionally and scientifically and they continued treatment/help for sick masses for a number of years before they could be accepted by the government. In fact, these medical systems were recognized by the government one after the other, that is, when one was recognized, the others were at their stage of development.
Qualified practitioners were in practice and continuously assisted in the development of the new systems. People who have used these drugs have benefited first, then they have turned to their representatives such as MPs and MPs to make their voices heard in Parliament, and then the government recognizes the system by enacting legislation. Today, four medical systems are recognized. Certainly, the fifth will also be recognized, because no law has been passed in parliament to prevent the invention and then the promotion, development and research of a medical system. There is no prohibition on the use and practice of these harmless healing methods according to the 1991 judgment of the Calcutta High Court. This is attested by a “legal review” Vol.II of 1991, which was published in Calcutta. Hon`ble Delhi High Court (Bench Division), composed of Judge Y.K.